The latest emanation from the otherwise unemployable Brian Lilley is staggering in its illogical structure. The only people who could even think this was a coherent statement are those who are so stupid that they probably cannot function without help in society.
Ezra’s slightly less intelligent “mini-me” is trying to conflate two very different instances in order to whip up the knuckle draggers who think he is an intellectual from the right.
He complains about the apparent anti-christian, anti-white bias in those who are railing against the racists in the Harper government over the niqab affair and the low-brows are eating it up.
In 2003, citing security concerns, new government regulations were brought in regarding photo identification.
The move changed an existing law that did not require everyone to have photo ID.
Q1 – did this requirement for photo ID extend to muslim Canadians too?
A1: Yes it did. So Brian and his idiots… as it applied to ALL Canadians then it was not discriminatory was it? And remember the point of photo ID is to identify (the ID bit) the person possessing it. So niqab wearing muslim women would also have had to remove any face coverings in order to be photographed as well.
And Brian stumbles onward
There is a valid security concern about who is taking the oath of citizenship. In Canada, we have always taken oaths and sworn testimony with faces uncovered. There were no rules because none were needed. It was expected and it was how we operated.
Let me fix that for you jackass, “There is a valid security concern that a new citizen’s identity be established prior to them signing the citizenship agreement.”
The lady taking the oath had already had her identity established while signing the paperwork. The oath is purely ceremony and not in anyway a part of the legal/security process. So taking an oath in this case is not accompanied by any security risks at all.
Why are hateful cowards always so stupid?