Blatchford, a woman who has fought for nothing, criticises other women who do using half truths.

I’m a fairly new citizen of Canada, but came from the UK and lived in a military environment during the 60s, 70s and 80s becoming a part timer in the early 90s; so it was with interest that I read the latest word vomit from apologist for powerful men (preferably in a uniform), La Blatch.

The first thing that struck me as particularly ironic was her criticism of a woman leader who is actually trying to get a government to stand by its obligations. The Indian Act may be all those things that the “screechers” on the right claim it is, but one thing no one can deny is it’s a legal contract. It was signed by a former Canadian government after discussion and agreement and did include the following as La Blatch herself admits:

….. and treaties that were expected to be in place “as long as the sun shines, the grass grows and the river flows.”

So Chief Spence is somehow in the wrong because she actually expects the treaty to be honoured as it was written and signed. How is this in anyway controversial, except to fraudsters and liars?

Next the good lady journo opinionist decides to attack the Chief for financial mismanagement in support of a government that has not only mismanaged the finances of the country as a whole, but also mismanaged the finances of the Chief’s nation via its appointment of an Indian Agent. The biggest cost of his enforced appointment appears to have been covering the costs of appointing the agent and fighting to keep the agent there. On this however Blatch is silent once more confirming that opinions aren’t necessarily based in reality.

But the statement form Blatchford that hit home with me was the attempt to tar the Chief with the brush of being a terrorist. Many a Harper puppet has tried to do that too and the word is fast becoming meaningless because of it. According to the know-nothing Blatchford.

It is tempting to see the action as one of intimidation, if not terrorism: She is, after all, holding the state hostage to vaguely articulated demands. But if she were to die on Mr. Harper’s watch, it would be not only tragic, but also disastrous.

She justifies this by insisting that Bobby Sands went on a hunger strike and was a terrorist too you see, so connecting the dots….. As she admits in her piece, Bobby Sands was in gaol on terrorism charges because he was found guilty of weapons offences at a time of armed conflict and in a country riven by atrocity. Her equivalence is not only absurdly false but is an insult to the folk who died during those years of unrest and division and those they left behind, as well as the Chief. Chief Spence has never been convicted of a crime or even as far as I can find, charged with one; unlike many in the Harper party whom Blatchford seeks to support. But unlike those people, about whom nothing bad can be uttered, Chief Spence won’t be elevated to the Senate I’ll warrant.

I remember living in the UK during the “Troubles” and can totally and utterly confirm that Chief Spence’s actions are so far from terrorism, that to even try and compare them as the Post and its opinionist seem to want to do is despicable beyond comparison.

Three outright lies and/or half truths passed off as argumentation. How Blatchford keeps getting paid for what she does is beyond me.

tip 6th sense

About harebell

Live in Alberta Fiscally conservative and socially more "live and let live" though I draw the line at folk who abuse their authority. Never bored
This entry was posted in Journalism, Law, Military, Politics. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Blatchford, a woman who has fought for nothing, criticises other women who do using half truths.

  1. diamondwalker says:

    It was not a good day for Ms Blatchford.. That particular piece o ‘journalism’ or opinion did her no favor, added some more stink to great white father Stephen Harper’s pious posturing. A controversial n smelly bone of contention to try and bury. I expect this shite from sheltered Toronto boy Stephen.. to see it come from Blatchford, tho.. I’m a wee bit stunned. I thought she was more intelligent and realistic as a seasoned journo than a smarmy political weasel-animal thug like The Honorable Mr Harper.

    Poor Stevie, poor Ms Blatchford .. the freedom, the confidence, to speak freely or hold their ground.. stems muchly from the environment they flourish in… the f’in ‘habitat’ … !!

    If Harper or Blatchford opine the environment was bestowed on them via King George, Divine Right, Preston Manning, Dudley Do Right .. or invisible friends in heaven.. they need to get a grip on reality… As Canadians we live in a land of incredible and astounding diversity. Mountain, tide, prairie, tiega, wetland, summer ice, boreal, rain forest, maritime icebergs, chinook, blizzard or borealis.. that us. As Canucks we flourish in the privilege and absolute unfettered freedom of saying exactly what we feel or think !

    That easy confidence.. that unique ‘hoser’ ‘tude’
    we exude with every single Canadian stubborn unique caring breath

    its not based on Stephen Harper’s colonial faux pas aberrant presumptions
    its instead a wondrous gift.. a generous shared birthright from The First Nations
    freely given … without restriction of any sort or nature …

    This wonderful land… there to share ….

    Sell it to China … Uh ….
    We should do that because Stephen Harper says its pretty neat
    and jobs, the economy, secrecy, obstruction, and election fraud
    Depend On It …

    uh .. mm

  2. Boris says:

    Oh, I think there is a comparison but not the one Blatchford makes. I mean, she could have said something to the effect that injustices and inequalities in in colonial scenarios tend to result in violence if the colonial power does not acknowledge the legitimacy of the problem and also take effective steps to bring justice and equality. But she didn’t.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s